Law No. 75/2017 on Baldios

Download Law No. 75/2017 (PDF) View Original Source (PGDLisboa)

Statutory & Legislative Architecture • At a Glance

Statutory & Constitutional Anchor

Art. 82(4)(b) Portuguese Constitution & Law No. 75/2017: Integrates baldios and community means of production into the constitutional cooperative and social sector.

Property & Tenure Regime

Germanic Common-Hand (Gesamthand) Tenure: Possessed collectively by resident commoners (compartes) as common appurtenant land (logradouro comum, Arts. 2–3).

Asset Lock & Surplus Rule

Outside Legal Commerce & 20% Reserve Lock: Perpetually inalienable and immune from attachment (Art. 6); surpluses are non-distributable with a ≥20% reinvestment reserve (Art. 14).

Democratic Governance

Three-Tier Communal Democracy: Sovereign Assembly of Commoners (assembleia de compartes), Executive Council (conselho diretivo), and Supervisory Committee (Arts. 17–32).

Neither State Domain nor Private Property

Across Europe, rural commons are routinely misclassified by Anglo-American legal and financial translators as either 'public state land' or 'unclaimed wasteland'. Portugal's Law No. 75/2017 of 17 August (Regime aplicável aos baldios e aos demais meios de produção comunitários), which covers more than half a million hectares of communal forests, pastures, wind-energy ridges, and community infrastructure (threshing floors, ovens, windmills, and watermills) across northern and central Portugal, offers one of the most rigorous statutory refutations of that binary in modern Civil Law.

Anchored directly in Article 82, paragraph 4, letter b) of the Portuguese Constitution — which divides ownership of the means of production into three co-equal sectors: the public sector, the private sector, and the cooperative and social sector — Law No. 75/2017 codifies baldios as a permanent, self-governing community property subsector. Following the 1974 Carnation Revolution and Decree-Laws Nos. 39/76 and 40/76, which restituted communal lands seized under the Estado Novo dictatorship's compulsory afforestation campaigns (regime florestal), the 2017 Act modernised the governance, fiscal exemptions, and contractual safeguards of local communities against both speculative land-grabbing and municipal enclosure.

The Triple Shield of the Commons and the 20% Reinvestment Lock

For legal and financial practitioners, the heart of the statute lies in the interplay between Article 6 (the property shield), Article 14 (the financial asset lock), and Articles 36 and 51 (resource-use contracting):

Outside Legal Commerce (Fora do Comércio Jurídico): Under Article 6, paragraphs 2 to 4, baldio lands lie strictly outside legal commerce (res extra commercium). They cannot be pledged, mortgaged, or attached by creditors (penhora), nor can any third party ever acquire title over them through adverse possession (usucapião). Any private deed of appropriation is null ab initio, and both individual commoners and the Public Prosecutor's Office enjoy standing and court-cost exemptions (Art. 16(5)) to petition for nullity and restitution of possession.
Non-Distributable Surpluses & the 20% Reserve Floor: Under Article 14, revenues generated by a baldio — whether from sustainable forestry, grazing, or renewable-energy ground grants — are non-distributable (não são distribuíveis) among individual commoners. After covering administration costs, at least 20 per cent of net positive surpluses must be locked into a dedicated reserve for the future valorisation of the baldio, with the remainder invested in forestry reinvestment and the cultural and social improvement of the local population centres.
Banning Commercial Leases in Favour of Grants of Exploitation (Cessão de Exploração): To prevent commercial corporations from invoking statutory tenant-renewal or pre-emption rights over communal land, Article 51 abolishes the renewal of commercial leases (contratos de arrendamento) enacted under the short-lived 2014 reform. Under Article 36, third parties may only utilise community resources through a written grant-of-exploitation contract (contrato de cessão de exploração) authorised by a two-thirds qualified majority of the Assembly of Commoners.

Translator's Introduction: Structural & Terminological Choices

Translating Law No. 75/2017 into British English requires preserving the exact boundaries between Germanic common-hand (Gesamthand) property law, Portuguese civil procedure, and cooperative accounting:

Retaining Baldios, 'Commoner' (Comparte), and 'Common Appurtenant Land' (Logradouro Comum): Rendering baldios as 'wastelands', 'vacant lands', or 'municipal commons' would erase their constitutional status as productive community property. I retain baldios in italics alongside British commons terminology: a comparte is rendered as a 'commoner' (never a corporate 'shareholder' or 'partner', as a comparte holds no divisible quota and cannot demand partition), universo de compartes is rendered as 'body of commoners', and logradouro comum (Arts. 2(a)(iv) and 3) is rendered as 'common appurtenant land' (preserving the exact same root in Art. 6(8)(a) for the surrounding curtilage, área de logradouro).
'Grant of Exploitation' (Cessão de Exploração) vs. Administrative 'Concession' or Commercial 'Lease': In Portuguese law, a concessão is a public-law administrative franchise over state property, whereas a contrato de arrendamento is a private commercial lease (barred from renewal under Art. 51). Rendering cessão de exploração as 'grant of exploitation' (and cessionário as 'grantee') aligns directly with our Catalan/Spanish glossary standard for cessió d'ús ('grant-of-use') and reflects a time-limited, democratically authorised grant of resource rights.
'Legal Personality' (Personalidade Jurídica) vs. 'Judicial Personality' (Personalidade Judiciária, Art. 4(1)): Article 4, paragraph 1 codifies a vital distinction of Portuguese civil procedure: a local community is not an incorporated legal person (não têm personalidade jurídica), yet it holds full 'judicial personality' (personalidade judiciária — the capacity to sue and be sued in court in its own name), which is kept strictly distinct from procedural 'standing to petition' (legitimidade, Art. 6(10)).
'Alienation' (Alienação) vs. 'Acts of Disposition' (Atos de Disposição), and 'Null' (Nulo) vs. 'Voidable' (Anulável): In accordance with Bryan Garner's Anti-Synonym Rule, atos de disposição (Art. 17(1), extraordinary management powers) and alienação (Arts. 6(6) and 40, exceptional transfer of land out of the community domain) are kept strictly separate, as are absolute nullity ('null', nulo, Art. 6(4)) and relative voidability ('voidable', anulável, Art. 6(5)–(7)).
Eliminating Civil Law Property & Tort False Friends (Arts. 48(2) & 51(2)): In Article 48, paragraph 2, acessão industrial imobiliária is rendered as 'artificial accession to immovable property' (accession by human labour under Civil Code Arts. 1325–1326 and 1340, never 'industrial accession') and autor da incorporação as 'the party who incorporated the construction into the land' (never 'author of the incorporation'). In Article 51, paragraph 2, compensation for terminated leases is restricted to 'direct losses' (danos emergentes / damnum emergens, excluding loss of future profit, lucros cessantes).